You realise you’re acting out the entire point of the article? You’re calling me “The Wrong Kind of Trans”, while simultaneously accusing me of not accepting quislings because THEY’RE “The Wrong Kind of Trans”. This is the whole point of the article. You don’t get to dismiss me simply because I’m not transgender in the way you would personally prefer.

And no, we do not call them quislings because of that. If you had read the article properly, you would have seen “quisling” refers to a collaborator. We call them quislings because they wilfully assist gender criticals in attacking transgender people for being trans in a way that you don’t approve of.

And I don’t assert myself as an authority on who is and isn’t trans. AGAIN, if you had read the article properly, firstly I explicitly stated I WASN’T going to do that as it wouldn’t be fair, and secondly that such persons don’t match the DEFINITION of being transgender. I always find it ironic that a group that b*llocks on about “adult human female” is the definition of “woman” has a massive problem with the definition of transgender.

If you want to have that argument, go take it up with the quislings, and ask them what, about a person presumed male at birth stating they are still male makes them in any way transgender? You won’t get a response.

And lastly, I find it outrageously hypocritical that you accuse me of hate, then finish with “Surfing on the trans gender wave has given you delusions of grandeur”.

Yes, how dare I stand up for myself.