“Ghastly language” — you mean the latin prefix “cis” meaning “of the same side”? You mean that language which has given thousands of prefixes, postfixes and language components for literally centuries? Are you high?

Actually, I can tell you’re on something because you just tried to posit “well you can make stuff up so therefore so can I and thus I’m automatically right” as a good argument.

Gender identity (not expresison, roles, or stereotypes) has been well researched for decades. It’s not some new fashion like you believe it is. If you took enough time out of your echo chamber to do some objective research, you would know this.

Also, “Why is it so hard for some males” — I suggest you don’t bother interacting with me anymore, until you can get over your psychotic need to hammer home the word male until it’s erected in a 90 foot sign with 400 megaphones blasting out. This is what gives you away. If you were all about “genuine concerns” you’d respect gender identity and limit yourself to those genuine concerns. Instead your first port of call is to demand that trans women are males as the central tenet and make sure everyone knows that “males (trans women), that is tans women (males), i.e. male trans women males that are male males (trans women) who are male males (problem) males”. If you respond any more, I am going to delete your comments.

You are just wasting my time at this point.